disaster( 三 ) _秒懂生活

震动之后：流动的再分配
在全球疫情开始缓解的2021年初，流动在恢复，但是流动的具体方式和意涵——什么群体在怎么流动——在发生变化。流动在不同群体和方式之间重新分配。

文章插图
2021年1月16日，危地马拉，来自洪都拉斯的又一次难民潮试图经过危地马拉进入美国。
1. 底层群体不得不继续流动，不得不冒险突破各种关于流动的管治。他们的流动因此更危险也具有更强的非法性。比如我们在伊朗-阿富汗和伊朗-伊拉克边境地带看到的那样。
2. 中下层群体，可能会对流动采取保守的态度。像在危地马拉的农民那样，会更加意识到流动带来的多种风险。如何在不流动的情况下维持生计，可能成为人们的首选家计策略。
3. 政府会加强流动的管治，但是不一定会减少流动。像日本的案例显示的那样，疫情带来的经济冲击，可能让日本政府更需要外劳，所以可能会采取措施去稳定、甚至扩大其所谓“技能实习生”计划。政府的管治可能会体现在微观上的对流动过程的“安全”化，而不体现在总量上的控制。
最后，平台公司可能会进一步推进流动的“商品化” 。需要流动但是不愿意流动的人，可以购买别人的流动，比如外卖、跑腿、快递等服务。这些流动的“恢复” ，将连带着个体-政府-资本，以及地方-国家-全球之间多重关系的变化。
References:
Anderson, B. and Peter Adey. (2012). ‘Governing Events and Life: “Emergency” in UK Civil Contingencies’. Political Geography 31 (1): 24–33.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (First Edition). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Idler, A. and M. Hochmüller. 5 June 2020. ‘Venezuelan migrants face crime, conflict and coronavirus at Columbia’s closed border’. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/venezuelan-migrants-face-crime-conflict-and-coronavirus-at-colombias-closed-border-137743
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2020). ‘ILO: Release more than 150,000 seafarers trapped on board ships due to COVID-19’. https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_747293/lang--en/index.htm
Japan Times. 5 April 2020. ‘Chinese students feeing virus face uneasy reception back home’. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/04/05/asia-pacific/chinese-students-fleeing-virus-face-uneasy-reception-back-home/#.XuCxRUZKi00
Kington, T. 8 March 2020. ‘As Italy extends quarantine zone, many flee; angry officials tell them to go back’. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-03-08/italy-extends-quarantine-across-north-many-flee
Kirton, D. and R. Woo. 17 March 2020. ‘Chinese students flock home as coronavirus shuts Western campuses’. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-students/chinese-students-flock-home-as-coronavirus-shuts-western-campuses-idUSKBN2150J4
Klein, N. (2008). The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Macmillan Publishers.
McGrath, J. W. (1991). ‘Biological impact of social disruption resulting from epidemic disease’. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 84(2), pp. 407-19.
Rothstien, M. et al. (2003). ‘Quarantine and Isolation: Lessons Learned from SARS: A Report to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’. Institute for Bioethics, Health Policy and Law University of Louisville School of Medicine.
Sewell, W. (2005). Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. University of Chicago Press.
Sewell, W. (2008). ‘The temporalities of capitalism’. Socio-Economic Review, 6(3), pp. 517-537.
The Hindu. 9 June 2020. ‘Coronavirus India lockdown Day 77 Updates: June 9, 2020.’ https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/india-coronavirus-lockdown-june-9-2020-live-updates/article31784353.ece
The Tribune. 23 May 2020. ‘4 crore migrant workers in India; 75 lakh return home so far: MHA’. Tribune India. https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/4-crore-migrant-workers-in-india-75-lakh-return-home-so-far-mha-88940
Xu, X. et al. (2020). The Geographical Destination Distribution and Effect of Outflow Population of Wuhan When the Outbreak of COVID-19[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 49(3): 324-329.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. Profile Books.
责任编辑：伍勤

disaster( 三 )

秒懂生活扩展阅读